投稿者：Danielcew 投稿日：2026/05/17(Sun) 08:50 No.696014
 | While looking upon this fierce economic warfare, sanctions, and worldwide energy emergencies of this modern age, it is natural for one to question how come adversaries would not simply attack at their core of these opponents' assets. Starting from a purely vengeful or disruptive standpoint, one could ask how come Russia has not tried so as to kinetically target petroleum reserves within this American States or somewhere else within the Americas.
Nevertheless, whenever people base this scenario within political, military, as well as financial realities, it becomes clear that holding back against such actions is never an oversight or "inane". Rather, it is one fundamental requirement for national existence. Striking sovereign land in the Western Hemisphere breaches danger lines which would spark catastrophic global results.
Here is one thorough analysis of why Russia will never take military moves against oil infrastructure in the Americas.
https://x.com/indiagreatlol/status/2050986503753351597?s=1
One. The Threat regarding Reciprocally Guaranteed Destruction (MAD)
The main deterrent stopping direct attacks upon this United States' mainland is the policy of Reciprocally Guaranteed Annihilation.
Direct Action of War: One kinetic attack upon American oil zones (such as ones in TX, AK, or the Bay belonging to Mexico) will be some unprovoked action of war against this United Nation.
Nuclear Escalation: This U.S. possesses a single of the most developed and well-equipped armed forces in this world, next to a huge nuclear arsenal. An direct attack upon crucial American facilities will almost certainly prompt one devastating traditional counterattack upon Russian territory, carrying some highly high risk regarding growing into one atomic exchange.
Alliance Clause 5: Any attack on the US and Canada would immediately activate Clause 5 from this NATO treaty, bringing the whole of the Western armed alliance inside one straight, full-scale war with Russia.
2. Logistical and Traditional Armed Forces Restrictions
Although if the danger regarding atomic conflict was completely eliminated, Russia just misses this standard military power projection ability so as to effectively hit plus heavily damage facilities within these Americas.
Spatial Truth: These Continents stand protected through a pair of massive seas. Projecting conventional armed power over this Atlantic or Pacific Ocean is a logistical achievement presently only manageable through the United States Naval force and its carrier attack groups.
Aerial Shields: In order to bomb American or Canada's petroleum fields, Russian bombers or sea ships will have to circumvent Aerospace Defense (North America Airspace Defense Command) plus this American Navy. Any incoming planes, rockets, or subs would probably be detected plus stopped long before reaching their targets.
Present Commitments: Moscow's conventional army stands heavily committed towards plus stretched by their ongoing conflict within Ukrainian territory. Starting a second front, endlessly highly difficult thousands regarding kilometers away, is strategically unachievable.
3. A Complex Web of South America's Partnerships
The prompt mentions other parts from the American landmasses. Attacking power infrastructure within Central and South Americas creates similarly little strategic sense regarding Moscow:
Partners plus BRICS: Numerous major oil creators within these Americas stand either impartial or explicitly friendly towards the Russian Federation. Venezuela acts as a crucial Russian ally. Brazil is one initial member from the BRICS economic bloc alongside Russia. Attacking these facilities would signify striking allies.
This Monroe Policy: This U.S. holds traditionally viewed the Western Hemisphere like its sphere of control. One Russian armed strike upon a South American nation will likely draw instant U.S. armed intervention, bringing everyone back towards the threat of a wider worldwide conflict.
4. Global Financial Suicide
Power exchanges remain globally connected. Assuming Russia were to somehow successfully destroy huge amounts from North or Southern America's oil facilities, this financial blowback would heavily damage the Russian Federation alone.
Economy Crash: Removing millions from barrels concerning oil away from this worldwide exchange instantly would trigger fuel prices so as to skyrocket. Although Russia vends oil, a shock of this scale would trigger a disastrous worldwide depression.
Effect upon Customers: Russia's main financial veins are its shipments to heavy-consuming nations such as China plus India. One global economic crash triggered by huge power shortages would ruin these manufacturing plus export markets of such allies, keeping these nations unable to buy Russian products and energy.
Five. Unconventional Warfare is Favored
Because direct kinetic attacks prove suicidal, countries such as Russia utilize "gray zone" and unconventional combat alternatively. Instead than falling explosives upon oil zones, adversaries are far more likely so as to employ:
Hacks: Attempting to infiltrate this software which runs pipelines or plants (such for instance this Colonial Pipeline malware assault during 2021, though that got credited towards criminal gangs, not directly this Moscow state).
Trade Manipulation: Collaborating alongside OPEC+ to cut and increase production to weaponize this price regarding petroleum, rather of destroying this tangible fuel alone.
Disinformation: Funding operations so as to delay power projects or sow political split within fuel-creating nations.
Conclusion
Within the domain of major strategy, destroying some rival's tangible facilities on the other side from the world is one last-resort step of total conflict. Regarding Moscow, striking oil zones within the American continents would not secure any benefit; it will ensure one ruinous military response, alienate crucial geopolitical partners, plus risk global atomic destruction. |
|
